Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Arizona Judge Grants Republicans November Victory

Open borders advocates will presumably be jumping for joy at the ruling, announced just minutes ago, granting a preliminary injunction to prevent Arizona from enforcing its new immigration law.

Enjoy it while it lasts, people.

Judge Bolton has justed handed the Republican Party a slam-dunk issue in the November elections. 
Over 70% of America supported that law. The silent majority of Americans are fed up with illegal immigration. They aren't the people who get on buses to protest one way or another, but they are the people who vote. They will not appreciate that the federal government not only fails to enfore immigration law, but actually went out of its way to file a lawsuit against Arizona for trying to combat illegal immigration.

The smartest thing the Republican Party could do right now, as in today, is introduce a bill in Congress to expressly authorize states to enforce federal immigration law, and to pass their own laws to combat illegal immigration.  The Democrats would of course prevent that bill from reaching the President's desk, and the Republicans would have a major, winning issue for November.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, moreover, will probably reverse Judge Bolton's decision in any event. I know, I know, you're thinking that particular court is "liberal" and "the most reversed court in America." But if you review the Ninth Circuit's decisions on federal immigration law, you might be surprised because, as I showed in a prior essay, those decisions allow states to enforce existing federal immigration law.  In March 2010, moreover, the Ninth Circuit upheld an Arizona law to punish employers who hire illegal aliens.

Nor is Arizona required to sit idly by and wait to appeal the Court's decision.  Arizona's legislature will presumably review Judge Bolton's ruling and "amend around" it to the greatest extent possible.  For example, if her decision says Arizona cannot require aliens to carry their visa with them, the legislature could simply authorize its officers to determine whether aliens are complying with the federal law that already requires them to do so.

Bottom line:  This isn't over. This is just starting.

[To read the judge's ruling for yourself, click here.  I'll write more about it after I read it.]

3 comments:

  1. Channel 7's 11 a.m. news spotlighted an 'immigration' activist. He said immigration and immigrants' rights several time, but not once was it prefaced with the "illegal" qualifier.

    I am so sick of these people who lump ALL immigrants together. No one is legal immigrant bashing. We don't want illegal aliens in our country any more than one of these "immigrants rights" people would want strangers cammping in the yards or homes, uninvited.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It looks like Governor Brewer is already in the works of filing an appeal. And I completely agree with sandscripts comments above, there is a HUGE difference between legal and illegal immigrants.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm wondering if Mr. Obama has sealed his own fate in 2012 on this issue. The failure of the DOJ to pursue similar actions against sanctuary cities was just too naked a political calculation.

    We'll see, I suppose. Round 2 for our president is over two years away, however, November is just around the bend.

    ReplyDelete