If he was such a shoo-in, why did he need so much money for his re-election campaign? Anyway, here's yet another violation of ethics laws explaining how Villaraigosa was re-elected despite his abysmal record: click here for L.A. Times article re $184,000 fine.
This is outrageous! He must have been more scared than he let on that common sense would prevail among the voters and he'd lose the election.
ReplyDeleteI think the mayor should resign immediately and you-know-who become mayor for the remainder of the term. Are you ready to serve? The legal city residents need you!
How do you prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the Mayor knew how this money came about, or was complicit in setting up this contribution?
ReplyDeleteHas the Mayor issued any denials of complicity or knowledge about the elicit origins of this campaign money? Is Hugh ready to flip on the Mayor to save his own hide from the Grand Jury?